A+ for EPAT
Our journal, Educational Philosophy and Theory
, is ranked A+ in the Australian government classification of academic
publications.

The Australian Research Council maintains and develops
the system of assessment for government in consultation with the
National Health and Medical Research Council, and with advice from
the Department of of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research.
It is known as the Excellence in Research for Australia
(ERA) initiative.
ERA reflects the Australian Government's commitment
to a transparent, streamlined, approach for evaluation of the excellence
of research undertaken in Australia's universities, using readily
available information where practical.
ERA assesses excellence across the full spectrum of
research activity. It measures both the extent of research activity
and the quality of the work.
The ERA rates over 19,500 unique peer reviewed journals,
of which over 300 journals are in the field of Education. Approximately
5% of these are selected for the A+ category. Educational Philosophy
and Theory is in the A+ band along with other outstanding
education journals.

Our journal editor, Michael Peters,
waits for your paper.
The ranking
system
Each journal has a single quality rating
and is assigned to one or more disciplines defined by the Field
of Research.
Indicators of research quality includes an analysis
of ranked research publications according to four broad bands A+,
A, B, C defined as follows:
Quality of the papers A+ (the top 5% of journals)
Typically an A+ journal would be one of the best in
its field or sub field in which to publish and would typically cover
the entire field/sub field. Virtually all papers they publish will
be of a very high quality. These are journals where most of the
work is important (it will really shape the field) and where researchers
boast about getting accepted. Acceptance rates would typically be
low and the editorial board would be dominated by field leaders,
including many from top institutions.
Quality of papers A (next 15% of journals)
The majority of papers in a tier A journal will be
of very high quality .Publishing in an A journal would enhance the
author's standing, showing they have real engagement with the global
research community and that they have something to say about problems
of some significance. Typical signs of an A journal are lower acceptance
rates and an editorial board which includes a reasonable fraction
of well known researchers from top institutions.
Quality of papers B (next 30% of journals)
Tier B covers journals with a solid, though not outstanding,
reputation. Generally, in a tier B journal, one would expect only
a few papers of very high quality. They are often important outlets
for the work of PhD students and early career researchers. Typical
examples would be regional journals with high acceptance rates,
and editorial boards that have few leading researchers from top
international institutions.
Quality of papers C (the final 50% of journals)
Tier C includes quality, peer reviewed, journals
that do not meet the criteria of the higher tiers.
For further
information
The Australian Research Council
http://www.arc.gov.au/era/default.htm
Government consultation on
the ERA
http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ERA_ConsultationPaper.pdf
The Australian and New Zealand
Standard Research Classification
http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/2D3B6B2B68A6834FCA25697E0018FB2D?opendocument.
Support professional standards
The Philosophy of Education Society
of Australasia supports the assessment of professional standards
and welcomes all opportunities to participate in the development
of the system. Our members are involved in making submissions to
appropriate authorities and in writing critiques about the system.
We urge all PESA members to take an active interest in professional standards. Submissions regarding the ERA process may be submitted through your institution up to August 14th, 2008. Any member of the PESA executive can provide you with advice and support when you make a submission.

Senator Kim Carr
The Australian Minister responsible for research
|